Intel Report: June 8 2026

President Donald Trump says he had a "great meeting" with the heads of General Motors, Ford and racing team legend and businessman Roger Penske this week about legislation that, in the president's words, would prohibit people from repairing their own motor vehicles. On Thursday, June 4, he said the auto officials "want a bill that prohibits people from fixing" their cars, though it was unclear what legislation Trump was referring to. There are various pieces of legislation being bandied about Congress that would protect owners' rights to repair their own vehicles, though in some cases those rights might be restricted or owners could be required to meet certain safety standards. Car owners have a right to repair their own vehicles now but in recent years legal battles have been fought over car owners and independent auto repair shops getting access to onboard computer data that makes it far easier to diagnose and fix vehicles that automakers have in some cases sought to protect. Industry groups like the Alliance for Automotive Innovation have touted automakers' willingness to work with independent repair shops but also noted that providing unrestricted access to onboard data is a security and safety risk. | Detroit Free Press ($)

Some drivers are squeezing more miles out of their vehicles and eschewing new rides because of sticker shock, high interest rates and economic jitters. Others are hanging on to aging wheels simply because they can. Thanks to advancements in engineering, materials and safety technology, today’s cars last longer than vehicles of generations past. The average vehicle on U.S. roads is about 13 years old, a historic high and a 10% jump from a decade ago. While cars have steadily grown older over the last 15 years, the trend picked up after the Covid pandemic, when shuttered factories and supply-chain snarls drove up prices. The shift has accelerated in recent years as more car buyers balk at lofty new-vehicle prices, and many automakers grapple with fallout from America’s cooling on electric vehicles, which has cost companies tens of billions in lost investments and forced them to rethink their U.S. lineups. The reality is fundamentally reshaping the economics of buying, selling and fixing vehicles in America. Automakers, long laser-focused on the new-car market, are now pouring resources into propping up used-car sales, aftermarket parts and maintenance work. Dealers are investing in their repair shops, adding service bays and a phalanx of customer-friendly services once reserved for luxury patrons. All the while, competition for repair work is mounting among mom-and-pop mechanics, big oil-change shops and tire chains vying for a piece of the fix-it business. | The Wall Street Journal ($)

Carvana has been granted the option to invest in Slate Auto, the electric vehicle startup backed by Jeff Bezos, according to documents obtained by TechCrunch. Paperwork filed with Delaware’s division of corporations shows that the online used car retailer was given a warrant to buy shares in the startup in 2025 — around the same time Slate Auto was starting to put together its $650 million Series C funding round. It’s not clear if Carvana has exercised that warrant, or how many shares it is allowed to buy. Carvana declined to comment, and Slate Auto didn’t respond to requests for comment on the deal. The transaction with Carvana comes as the retailer is looking at ways to expand into new car sales, according to The Wall Street Journal. The company has reportedly purchased a number of Stellantis dealerships across the United States. Asked about new car sales on a recent earnings call, CEO Ernie Garcia III told analysts to “stay tuned.” Slate Auto is also just weeks away from announcing final pricing and taking the first nonrefundable preorders for its low-cost EV, which is expected to start in the mid-$20,000 range. Slate has said it will deliver its first vehicles by the end of this year. Similar to Tesla and other all-electric car companies like Rivian, Slate says on its website that it “won’t have traditional dealerships.” The company has said it will sell vehicles directly to customers, but it hasn’t offered much detail about how it plans to handle the logistics of the car-buying experience. Selling through physical Carvana dealerships could help mitigate some of those logistics headaches while also raising the startup’s profile. | TechCrunch ($)

Ford, GM and Stellantis are facing the same pressures but have placed structurally different bets in response: Ford has bet that the problem is product and cost; GM has bet that the problem is the architecture; Stellantis has bet that the problem is the balance sheet and the portfolio. | James Alford

Enlyte has released their "Trends Report 2026" which poses three future scenarios, each anchored in modeling the proliferation of cars with advanced driver assistant systems (ADAS) and incorporating the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) studies demonstrating that drivers of cars with ADAS are 30% less likely to be involved in a bodily injury claim. First Scenario: Through 2050, auto liability claims remain flat. Second Scenario: Auto Bodily Injury (BI) claims could decrease by ~10-15% as cars with ADAS proliferate and safety compounding benefits materialize. Third Scenario: The network effect proves consequential (and people get the message - hands free but eyes on the road), auto BI claims could decrease by 20% or more over the next 25 years. | Enlyte

The increasing need for memory chips to power artificial intelligence data centers could lead to ​dramatic price hikes in U.S. consumer goods and disrupt supply chains, groups representing automakers, ‌retailers, electronic firms and others said on Wednesday. The groups said in a letter to the U.S. Treasury and Commerce departments that "an urgent imbalance in the market for memory chips could lead to significant and sustained near-term price increases ​for American households and disrupt critical U.S. supply chains." | Reuters ($)

Montana has become sort of a Cayman Islands tax shelter for car collectors because it levies no general sales tax, and lawmakers created rules to allow tax-free vehicle purchases by LLCs. After paying a small registration fee, out-of-state owners are sent Montana license plates for what is now considered their “company” car. Tennessee, California and Utah have launched campaigns to identify and collect back taxes from the owners of these shell company vehicles. Last year, Utah Gov. Spencer Cox (R) signed legislation to create a data-sharing network to locate and assess residents driving vehicles with Montana license plates. The Utah effort could yield up to $100 million in back taxes. Similarly, the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration "has identified close to 500 California dealers involved in more than 2,500 sales since 2023 to customers claiming to use the vehicle in Montana. These sales, many of which involve luxury or exotic cars, cost the state more than $10 million a year in lost tax revenue.” | The Washington Post ($)

Used EV sales jumped 17% in the U.S. through the first four months of the year. That defied an almost 27% plunge in sales of new EVs and a 7% slide in overall new-vehicle deliveries. A growing number of Americans are finding refuge from soaring fuel prices in a used-car market that’s awash in affordable EVs that automakers struggled to sell at higher prices when they were new. Close to 40% of used battery-powered cars currently on dealer lots are priced below $25,000. | Bloomberg ($)

One of the great pitches for buying an EV is lower total cost of ownership. There are fewer moving parts in them, after all, so that would at least make sense from a maintenance perspective. There are a few hidden costs, though. Higher upfront price for new cars and a steep depreciation curve don't help matters. And there's one big monthly bill folks often forget to account for: insurance. A new study from Insurify shows that car insurance is one of the biggest cost differentiators between owning a traditional internal combustion-engine (ICE) car and an EV. In fact, the average late-model EV (from 2024 and newer) costs 18% more to insure than the average late-model gas-powered vehicle. Insuring a newer EV costs the average owner $3,293 for full coverage on an annual basis, the company says. The average for newer gas-powered vehicles is $2,792. That means newer EV owners, on average, spend $501 more to insure their vehicles each year. | Inside EVs

China has deliberately and aggressively expanded its EV footprint throughout Europe, the U.K., Asia and Australia, exporting millions of vehicles, building factories and widening supply chains. Despite tariffs, stringent regulations and fierce opposition from lawmakers and the American auto industry, there’s a growing possibility that Chinese electric vehicles will be sold in the U.S. in the next few years. Direct imports of Chinese-made EVs into the U.S. seems highly unlikely, but allowing them to be manufactured here, potentially in a joint venture, is a realistic option. | CNBC

A new bill working its way through Congress could impose a sales ban on Mercedes-Benz, among other automakers, over their equity ties to China, according to a new report from Automotive News. The bill, officially known as the Motor Vehicle Modernization Act of 2026, was introduced in the House of Representatives on February 5, and focuses on providing five years of federal funding for transportation and infrastructure. However, a recent amendment to the bill singles out Chinese influence as a danger to the domestic automotive industry. The new language aims to protect "the automotive industry from foreign adversaries," and prohibits a manufacturer controlled by a foreign adversary from selling, delivering, or importing any vehicle into the U.S. directly, according to CNBC. Lawmakers defined adversarial foreign control as an average ownership stake of at least 15 percent of the company, whether direct or indirect. This could quickly become problematic for Mercedes-Benz, as Beijing-based-and-state-owned automaker BAIC Group(Beijing Automotive Group CO.,Ltd) owns a 9.98 percent stake in the German automaker, while Li Shufu, founder of Zhejiang GEELY Holding Group, holds a 9.69 percent stake in Mercedes. So, with a total Chinese holding share of 19.67 percent, Mercedes could be banned from U.S. sales if the bill passes. | Road & Track

BYD is eyeing acquisitions of struggling European luxury brands including Maserati while simultaneously pursuing talks with Stellantis and other legacy automakers to acquire idle or spare manufacturing capacity — a two-pronged strategy to deepen its European roots and bypass EU tariffs. Brands such as Stellantis subsidiary Maserati are “very interesting,” BYD Executive Vice President Stella Li told Bloomberg May 13. It has yet to take any action, she added. Li did not specify which other brands BYD is considering beyond Maserati. Maserati is “not for sale,” Chief Operating Officer Santo Ficili said in a news conference in Modena, Italy, on May 28. The automaker is assessing several tech options, including cooperating with Chinese partners, Ficili said, according to Reuters. Europe is a favorite destination of Chinese electric vehicle exports because of the region’s strict emissions regulations, extensive charging infrastructure and high consumer demand. | Automotive News ($)

Some automakers and suppliers are shifting supply chains and organizational structures to prepare for a significant policy change: a ban on Chinese hardware and software for connected cars. While Volvo Cars’ ties to China prompted the need for a special authorization from the U.S. government May 26, that automaker is not alone. Other manufacturers are adapting to compliance hurdles in preparation for the U.S. ban on Chinese hardware and software, even as Western automakers rely on German, Japanese and Korean suppliers. The policy applies to Chinese software beginning with 2027 model-year vehicles and hardware starting with 2030 model-year vehicles. | Automotive News ($)

The U.S. is proposing strict new rules aimed at squeezing Chinese parts out of North America’s cars in bruising trade talks with Mexico. As part of the proposals, Donald Trump’s administration is demanding that more car parts — including electronics, which are typically imported from China — be sourced in North America for the fully assembled vehicle to qualify for duty-free treatment, said people familiar with the talks. That would make it harder for carmakers to import parts from China while also claiming duty-free treatment for vehicles under a trade agreement that aims to reward companies for building them in the U.S., Mexico or Canada. | Financial Times ($)

BYD was built around batteries. And its founder, Wang Chuanfu, created his car empire using the same rigid vertical integration that made them successful. That entails everything from running its own lithium-processing plants to training its own artificial-intelligence models. On May 28th, Mr Wang unveiled a semiconductor, designed in-house, that he claimed was the world’s most powerful for self-driving. With far fewer middlemen to deal with, BYD has managed to control costs even as they have surged for others, turning out ultra-cheap, high-quality models such as the Seagull, a compact EV that sells in China for around $10,000. Vertical integration is also credited with speeding up innovation, as engineers from different divisions collaborate on common problems. When supply bottlenecks have held back rivals, BYD has been able to step on the accelerator. It churns out new models faster than most, with several brands at different price points, some with captivating, quirky add-ons. Models from its luxury Yangwang brand can float in water or jump over potholes. One from Denza, another upmarket marque, can “crabwalk” sideways into parking spots. (It uses the brand “BYD” for its mass-market range.) The company’s strategy has served it well. Revenue has increased ten-fold in the past decade to $116bn last year. In 2025, it sold more cars than Elon Musk’s Tesla. Mr Wang is thought to be worth around $25bn. But the model is showing signs of weakness. Net profit fell for the first time in four years in 2025. In April sales fell, year on year, for the eighth month running. In the first two months of 2026, Geely ended BYD’s run of more than three years as China’s leading EV-seller, though BYD has since reclaimed top spot. One problem is that the battery-maker is starting to look out of place as China’s car industry focuses far more on software and entertainment. Young would-be customers often inspect the large entertainment display panels on the dashboard before anything else. Several rising challengers, such as Xpeng and Li Auto, were founded by internet bosses rather than industrial tycoons. | The Economist ($)

Volkswagen led the Chinese market for decades, with the country once estimated to account for more than half its annual profit. But the company’s position in China has rapidly eroded in recent years amid fierce competition from local electric-vehicle makers with more advanced digital technology. To catch up, Volkswagen has sought to insulate its floundering Chinese business from the Eurocentric designs and slow decision-making of its German headquarters. It has invested $3.5 billion in cutting-edge development facilities in Hefei and struck deals with several tech-savvy local firms. Now, the first cars produced under its “in China, for China” strategy are hitting the road. Whether the vehicles win over Chinese drivers is a litmus test for Volkswagen’s future prospects in the country. They are also a test case for the survival of other Western brands in China, where consumers increasingly favor local champions. | The Wall Street Journal ($)

Eighteen months after killing off Cruise, its independent robotaxi subsidiary, General Motors has hired back more than 100 members of the unit’s former team, including senior managers who have moved back into their old roles. GM’s partial reconstitution of its Cruise staff—the company let go some 1,000 Cruise employees after disbanding the unit—reflects a broad auto industry consensus that consumers will soon begin to expect and demand hands-off and later eyes-off autonomous capability in their cars. In China last month, representatives of multiple local automakers told me that consumers there were already beginning to expect advanced autonomous features in any new car they inspected for purchase. GM’s embrace of personal autonomous vehicles also reflects somewhat of a shift in industry thinking from a decade ago, when the company bought Cruise for $1.1 billion based on the belief that the autonomous future was driverless ride-hailing businesses, popularly known as robotaxis. Cruise was neck and neck with Waymo in a race to commercialize robotaxis, and GM CEO Mary Barra said she expected Cruise to deliver $50 billion in revenue annually by 2030. In 2024, however, just ahead of planned trials to operate its cars without a safety driver, Barra said she had reconsidered robotaxis, deciding they would be too costly to scale up and operate. | The Information ($)

Robotaxis are expanding to cities worldwide, with companies like Amazon's Zoox and Alphabet-owned Waymo unveiling new models, but personally owned AVs may have a greater impact on urban life. The consumer vehicle market is much larger than the robotaxi market, and AV technology will be more lucrative if installed in personal vehicles, with many people preferring to own an autonomous vehicle rather than use robotaxis. An influx of personally owned AVs could lead to increased traffic congestion, with more miles driven and potential for "zombie miles" without passengers, prompting calls for policymakers to prepare regulatory mechanisms to balance traffic and congestion. | Bloomberg ($)

Uber’s CEO, Dara Khosrowshahi, was hired nine years ago to impose order on the chaos of the company’s wildly aggressive corporate culture. With that work complete, he’s been focused more recently on taming the chaos of consumers’ daily lives, adding everything from teen accounts to Costco delivery to the once-straightforward hailing app. Uber runs arguably the most sophisticated real-time consumer marketplace in the world. The company deftly balances the supply and demand for its 10 million couriers and drivers and nearly 200 million monthly active users via data-intensive, time-sensitive levers. Uber controls these levers so nimbly that it’s been able to seamlessly roll out feature after feature: Uber Pet, Senior Mode, grocery delivery, and more. And the company is profitable. After logging its first quarter in the black from operations in 2023, it generated $193 billion in gross bookings last year, with ride-sharing representing slightly more than half. Net income for 2025 topped $10 billion. While it’s still common to hear Uber and Lyft referred to as rivals, the label is tenuous: Uber’s market capitalization was 29 times greater than Lyft’s as of mid-May. AI—in the form of self-driving cars—represents a textbook Clayton Christensen disruptive threat to Uber: Using a mobile app to hail a ride with a human driver was revolutionary 15 years ago; eventually, it’ll sound quaint. Goldman Sachs expects the U.S. robotaxi market to be worth $19 billion by 2030 and $48 billion by 2035. | Fast Company ($)

Market conditions in China, regulatory changes there and its brands' speedy vehicle development threaten to put the United States behind in developing autonomous driving technologies, experts say. Direct comparisons are rare, given the lack of Chinese vehicles in the United States and data-sharing restrictions between the two nations. But that's changing. Tesla last week said its Full Self-Driving Supervised is launching in China with an update coming shortly following years of delays. Google affiliate Waymo is poised to compete against China's Baidu in London. And Chinese brands are expanding into more markets globally — including North America. | The Detroit News ($)

BYD says it will assume full financial liability for at-fault accidents that happen while its “God’s Eye” urban driving system is active in China — with no cap on the payout. It’s a commitment Tesla has never made for “Full Self-Driving,” and it flips the industry’s standard liability model on its head. Under the new guarantee, if a driver is using BYD’s urban “navigate-on-autopilot” function in compliance with regulations and is at fault in a crash, BYD will cover all direct economic losses the vehicle is liable for — repairs to the owner’s car, third-party property damage, and personal injury. The terms are unusually generous. There’s no payout cap, owners don’t need to buy a separate “intelligent driving insurance” product, and a claim won’t raise their commercial insurance premium the following year. | Electrek

BYD, the Chinese electric vehicle giant, is making a habit of stealing Tesla’s thunder. BYD scored a hat-trick last year. It unveiled a battery that recharges in a “flash” five minutes, offered “God’s Eye” advanced driver assistance systems, or ADAS, free across most models, and then comfortably took the global number one position in battery EV sales. The Chinese company has now unveiled something that doesn’t involve a new technology; rather it’s one of the most mundane things in the world of autos: a warranty. But this warranty poses a challenge not just to Tesla but to the wider autonomous driving project. BYD just announced a commitment to cover “all economic losses” from accidents, including third-party damage and personal injury, involving one of its ADAS offerings, Urban Navigate on Autopilot. It’s part of a push to broaden adoption of premium tiers of God’s Eye by new and existing BYD drivers as competition on such systems heats up in China. | Bloomberg ($)

On May 27, CNBC reported that, according to a Tesla employee and others familiar with the talks, the EV-maker and rocket and AI purveyor SpaceX are weighing a merger. Prior to that story, speculation about the potential tie-up was already running rampant. Wedbush Securities analyst Daniel Ives put the chances for a combo at 80%, adding that the game plan was already in place for fusing operations at Elon Musk’s two biggest holdings. Long-time Tesla investor Ross Gerber, citing that Musk had already folded xAI into SpaceX, stated that this new gambit would advance his vision of running one big company amounting to a kind of Berkshire Hathaway of AI-driven tech. As of today, betting site Kalshi displays 52% odds that a mega-deal will happen by May of next year. Though it’s impossible to predict if so many Wall Streeters are making the right call, one thing’s for certain: Capitalizing on the incredible buzz surrounding the pending SpaceX IPO as a strategy for rescuing stricken Tesla makes perfect sense for Elon Musk. At an expected market cap of $1.75 trillion, SpaceX stock looks vastly overpriced (and, as Shawn Tully from Fortune has written, an IPO prominent analysts are saying they’d avoid). So Musk could marshal its inflated shares as currency to pay big for Tesla, even making the deal at its current market cap, a number that’s also over the top based on any conventional metric. Without SpaceX as an acquirer in the wings, Tesla looks highly vulnerable to a major selloff, given that it’s somehow maintaining a gigantic, even expanding valuation as its profits dwindle. “It’s been my intuition for a long time that this has to happen,” says David Trainer, CEO of research group New Constructs. “It’s the only way to bail out Tesla shareholders. It’s what Tesla investors have been expecting for a long time,” and in his view, the anticipated grand exit that’s been bolstering its stock. A SpaceX-Tesla union would mark by far the largest merger of all time. Remarkably, the two enterprises’ valuations are about equal, since Tesla’s at $1.65 trillion sits just a shade behind SpaceX’s anticipated debut at $1.75 trillion. Let’s assume the most likely scenario that casts SpaceX as the buyer. To clinch the deal, it would need to issue a batch of new shares equivalent to 94% of the current number, reflecting the ratio between the two valuations ($1.65 trillion divided by $1.75 trillion). And that’s assuming SpaceX doesn’t have to pay a premium as almost always required in a takeover. SpaceX’s count would nearly double from the 4.1 billion shares its S-1 IPO filing effectively forecasts as of the debut, to 8 billion. | Fortune ($)

It’s not often that investors encounter something truly new in markets. But they will soon when SpaceX, OpenAI and Anthropic go public with trillion-dollar valuations, or close to it. No company listed in the US has ever come to market so extravagantly priced — by a long shot. All three are undeniably groundbreaking businesses with mindboggling potential in transformative fields. Companies with that profile typically demand a big down payment from investors for future growth. But these initial public offerings put that proposition on steroids — never have investors been asked to wager so much on an uncertain future. From these valuations, it’s hard to imagine the three debutantes delivering a post-IPO payoff anywhere near what publicly traded technology giants have produced in recent decades. The math is laughable, in fact. Median market capitalization at IPO for the Magnificent Seven was $1.2 billion. Their median market cap is now $3.1 trillion, more than a 2,500-fold increase. For SpaceX to achieve comparable growth from a $1.8 trillion starting valuation, it would have to approach a value of $5 quadrillion. Companies are not supposed to show up on exchanges already the world’s most valuable businesses. New ventures raise money privately when they’re small and speculative, but established businesses have almost always turned to public markets when they needed sizable capital for growth. Everyone wins: Venture investors offload their shares to cash in on their early support, and new investors participate in potentially even bigger gains ahead. That’s the story of practically every public company trading today, including tech behemoths Microsoft, Amazon and NVIDIA. | Bloomberg ($)

Wall Street has seen blockbuster IPOs in the past. None has blitzed through its operating machinery like SpaceX. Expected to raise more than twice as much as any prior IPO, Elon Musk’s rocket, satellite and AI conglomerate is arriving already so large and economically consequential that parts of the market are reorganizing around it. | Bloomberg ($)

Elon Musk has laid out hundreds of goals over the years for what he plans to achieve at his businesses. Mr. Musk, 54, has said his rocket company, SpaceX, will build a colony of humans on Mars. He has said that Tesla, his electric carmaker, will incorporate fully autonomous driving abilities into all of its cars. And he has promised to show that humanoid robots made by Tesla are dexterous enough to thread a needle. None of these have happened. Ahead of SpaceX’s planned initial public offering this month, The New York Times analyzed statements that Mr. Musk has made about his businesses on social media or during investor calls over the last 15 years. He delivered only some of what he said he would, when he said he would, the analysis found. Strikingly, Mr. Musk’s annual rate of success declined over time, even as he made more promises. Of the 13 goals he declared in 2015, he later achieved nearly three-quarters of them, The Times found. But of the 27 claims he made in 2020, fewer than half have been accomplished on time. Some still have deadlines far in the future. | The New York Times ($)

This chart has been haunting us. Perhaps the best illustration of the "K-Shaped Economy" - not a healthy trend for the automotive industry, if you extrapolate this out a few years into the future. | Reuters ($)

The SaaS Capital Index calculates the revenue multiple of publicly-traded Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) companies (the revenue multiple is based on annualized current run-rate revenue, not trailing or projected revenue. The index excludes SaaS companies serving B2C customers and very small B2B companies with annual revenue per customer of less than $500.) The median public SaaS company ARR valuation multiple (SCI) declined to 3.4x, the lowest level since 2011. This is down from a high of 17x back in 2020/2021. | SaaS Capital

The Automotive Ventures “Car of the Week”: a 1954 Maserati A6GCS by Fiandri & Malagoli. | Broad Arrow

Steve shared the stage with Brian Benstock and Aleksandr Usoltsev at ASOTU-CON to discuss if, when and how the Chinese OEMs will enter the U.S. market. Moderated by Paul J Daly. | ASOTU ($)

Nice to see Automotive Ventures portfolio company Auriga Space covered by The Defence Blog. | Defence Blog

Congratulations to the EECOMOBILITY team for this big milestone! | EECOMOBILITY

Great to see Jim Gibbs from Automotive Ventures portfolio company Meter Feeder featured in Axios. | AXIOS ($)

Chinese OEM BYD is considering the acquisition of a struggling European legacy automaker. Could this be their path into the U.S. market? | CBT News ($)

Here’s what Loanbridge looks like in the real world: millions of VINs monitored, hundreds of thousands of confirmed event matches, real collateral value located, and thousands of hours saved through automation. | LoanBridge.ai

Car Guy Coffee Podcast June 8 | Virtual | LINK

IBIS Global Summit 2026 June 16-18  | Vienna, Austria | Speaker | LINK

AIM Group AI Panel June 17  | Virtual | Speaker | LINK

Ai4 2026 Aug 4-6 | Las Vegas, NV | Speaker | LINK

AMPLIFY Aug 10-11 | Carlsbad, CA | Speaker | LINK

Automotive News Congress Sep 28-30 | Detroit, MI | Speaker | LINK

CIECA CONNEX Conference Sep 29 - Oct 1 | San Antonio, TX | Speaker | LINK

MEMA Aftermarket Technology Conference Oct 4-6 | Dallas, TX | Speaker | LINK

AICPA Dealership Conference Oct 19-20 | Nashville, TN | Speaker | LINK

Wholesale Auto Supply Annual Meeting Nov 10 | Florham Park, NJ | Speaker | LINK

Contact Us